Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is a critical driver of economic development in the Global South, delivering not only capital but also technological spillovers, export growth, and employment. However, the legal and regulatory frameworks that govern FDI in developing economies vary significantly in terms of openness, investor protections, and institutional efficiency. This article examines the current landscape of FDI law in developing countries as of 2025, focusing on entry restrictions, legal safeguards, incentive structures, and administrative hurdles. Drawing on global data and national examples—particularly India—it evaluates how regulatory frameworks affect FDI inflows and their contribution to economic growth.
The article highlights global trends toward protectionism, increasing use of investment treaties, and the role of institutional quality in maximizing FDI benefits. It also discusses emerging challenges including unequal FDI distribution, environmental risks, and the rise of regulatory nationalism. Finally, it outlines key policy reforms such as easing equity caps, digitalizing regulatory processes, and strengthening dispute resolution. With visuals illustrating sectoral restrictions and long-term inflow patterns, the article underscores the importance of predictable, transparent, and balanced FDI regimes to attract sustainable investment and achieve inclusive development outcomes.
Introduction
Foreign Direct Investment involves a foreign entity acquiring an ownership stake or substantial influence in the operations of a business in another country. For developing economies, FDI is vital not only as a source of external capital but also for its spillover effects such as productivity gains, technology diffusion, enhanced exports, and improved governance. However, the regulatory environment for FDI varies widely, influencing both the quantity and quality of inbound investments.
FDI Regulatory Structures in Developing Economies
Most developing countries impose specific regulations governing the entry of foreign investors. These include:
[image:1]
Fig 1: Prevalence of FDI entry restrictions in developing economies, by sector (2025)
Trends and Evolution in FDI Law (2023–2025)
Selected Country Example: India
India has liberalized its FDI regime—over 90% of inflows now enter under an automatic route—with notable increases in sectoral caps (insurance raised to 100% in 2025)[5][1]. Key authorities include the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), RBI, and various sectoral regulators. Prohibited sectors and nationality screening remain in place for sensitive areas[1].
The Impact of FDI Laws on Economic Outcomes
Positive Outcomes
Negative/Challenging Aspects
Institutional Quality and FDI Effectiveness
Enhancements in government effectiveness, regulatory quality, and the rule of law significantly boost the impact of FDI on economic growth[7]. Conversely, weak institutions dilute these benefits.
Institutional Dimension |
Influence on FDI Inflows |
Influence on FDI Spurred Growth |
Government Effectiveness |
High |
Strong |
Regulatory Quality |
High |
Strong |
Rule of Law |
Medium-High |
Strong |
Control of Corruption |
Medium |
Moderate |
Global Patterns and Data (2025)
[image:2]
Fig 2: FDI inflows to developing economies, 2008–2024
Policy Priorities and Reform Trends
Challenges Ahead
Conclusion
The regulatory climate for FDI in developing economies remains a powerful tool for shaping investment inflows, sectoral priorities, and economic outcomes. As global capital becomes scarcer and competition increases, developing economies must navigate the delicate balance of openness, investor protection, and national interests. Ongoing reforms, especially those improving institutional quality and legal predictability, are essential to harness FDI for sustained and equitable growth.
Figures & Graphs
References: