Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology
2025, Volume:6, Issue:1 : 1877-1881
Original Article
Crimes of Greed Versus Crimes of Need: A Comparative Analysis of Socio-Economic Impact and the Judicial Response to White-Collar Offences in India
 ,
1
Research Scholar, Teerthanker Mahaveer College of Law & Legal Studies, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, (U.P.)-India
2
Assistant Professor, Teerthanker Mahaveer College of Law & Legal Studies, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, (U.P)-India
Abstract

This paper undertakes a comparative analysis of crimes of greed and crimes of need, with particular emphasis on white-collar offences in India, to evaluate their socio-economic impact and the adequacy of judicial responses. Drawing upon criminological theory, statutory frameworks, judicial data, and comparative international perspectives, the study situates white-collar crime within the broader discourse on economic inequality, governance, and institutional accountability. Crimes of greed—characterized by deliberate exploitation of economic and regulatory structures for excessive private gain—are contrasted with crimes of need, which are often driven by socio-economic deprivation and survival imperatives. The paper argues that although crimes of need numerically outnumber greed-driven offences in India, the latter exert a disproportionately severe and systemic impact on the economy, public trust, and democratic institutions.

The analysis highlights persistent deficiencies in India’s legal and enforcement mechanisms, including low conviction rates, prolonged trial durations, politicization of investigations, and selective prosecution of offenders. Despite the existence of an extensive statutory framework encompassing the Indian Penal Code, financial regulations, and corporate governance norms, enforcement remains weak, particularly against influential economic actors. Through doctrinal analysis and selected case illustrations, the paper demonstrates how judicial and policy responses have failed to keep pace with the evolving sophistication of white-collar crime.

The study concludes that a rigid, punitive approach alone is insufficient. Instead, it calls for a differentiated and proportionate framework that recognizes the motivational divide between greed and need, strengthens investigative capacity, enhances judicial efficiency, and promotes ethical corporate governance. Such reforms are essential for mitigating the socio-economic harm caused by white-collar offences and restoring confidence in India’s justice delivery system

Keywords
Recommended Articles
Original Article
A Socio-Legal Analysis of Public Sentiment Regarding Adoption Rights for Same-Sex Couples
Original Article
GST 2.0: A Paradigm Shift Towards Simplified and Technology-Driven Taxation in India
Original Article
Social Security and Dependence on Government Assistance: A Study of Gig Workers in Indore City (2024–25)
...
Original Article
Assessing Public Awareness and Willingness to Support Green Infrastructure: A Survey of New Delhi's Sponge City Initiatives
Loading Image...
Volume:6, Issue:1
Citations
7 Views
2 Downloads
Share this article
© Copyright Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology